DETERMINISTIC PHYSICAL & INTELLIGENCE LEARNING BASED ON NEWTON'S ANTI-ENTROPY WITH SCREW-STRUCTURED PARTICLES
Chiharu
Sano
Cliest Corp., Research Center
48-11 Nakazato, Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa-ken,254-0054 Japan
E-mail: alai@yk.netlaputa.ne.jp Tel.:81-468-75-9456
Abstract
Probabilistic information entropy can classify but never make learning, defined in A.I. as extraction of function from data. As Newton was inspired of the Third Law, observing screws, I create a model of screw-structured particles, to 100% respect it. The vacuum ether is an ocean of electron-positron pairs. An electron has an anti-clockwise winding outer electric spiral and a clockwise inner mass spiral. A positron has its symmetric structure. With the screw model, we can deterministically calculate several physical entities, overcome the eclecticism of Copenhagen doctrine, explain why an accelerated orbital electron doesn't emit light, why atoms linked by screw electrons form a stable molecule, why "strong interaction" is just a Coulomb force, how "quark" (=fake) appears. The universe was created from the vacuum.
[N.B.] For further details, please consult my thesis and dissertation.
I.1. Compton scattering equation derivable, using micro-oscillation of physical time
Using the "micro-oscilation of physical time" I proposed in HYPOTHESIS-III, the equation of Compton scattering is derived.
Let us put: 
where I put 
instead of 
.
As the electron
rotates 
,
can
be considered here as 
. This rotation of is related to the
principle “One Rotation One Action”.
Therefore 
I.2. Compton scattering equation derivable, introducing a term of Newtonian Action
The key-point is
that if only we add a term derived from the action of Newton's
third law to the momentum equation Compton and Eisnstein derived,
we get the equation of Compton scattering. The number of electron-positron
pairs taking part in the action/reaction of Compton scattering is:
The action/reaction
equation of Newton's third law for one electron of an electron-positron
pair of vacuum interacting with the free electron, can be written
as:
If we omit 
of both sides and
integrate both sides with regard to the time, we get:
This is exactly the term we have to add to and modify the energy conservation law:
The equations of momentum conservation are:
, 
If we eliminate 
, we get: 
As the
definition of Compton wave-length is 
, we get: 
II."Newton's wave equation", i.e., Newton's original third law of action/reaction
(a)
derived from the
quantum relation: 
, 
and 
I here use 
as the velocity, as De
Broglie, and derive a new wave equation which would be a quantum
dynamic version of Newton’s third law.
De Broglie put
to be equal to the velocity of the matter wave 
, and the right hand side
can be transformed as follows, using the derivative in terms of
space, just like Schroedinger’s 
but here only 
.
(c)
Here just as De
Broglie put 
, I put the wave function as:
(d)
where 
is the force or the
derivative of the energy in terms of space distance. The reason
why I use cosine instead of sine is that it concerns matter wave
of matter made of Fermions. I mutiply the both hand sides of (c)
by 
. As 
:
(e)
If only we put 
, 
, 
, and 
, the equation (e) can be seen as
a quantum dynamics version of Newton’s Third Law of action and
reaction.
II.1. Beta-decay deterministically explained by "Newton's wave equation"
Pauli “solved”
the “energy conservation” problem by newly introducing the
existence of a particle neutrino, but this does not mean that
Pauli solved the question of “randomness” of the split of the
total fixed energy between the electron and the neutrino in beta
decay. But this, in fact, is not random and can be calculated
according to the exact mathematical space-time point, using the
above-mentioned wave function.
In the beta
decay of neutron, the electron captured inside the nucleon and
the electron-positron pair of the vacuum interact, and the
emerging anti-neutrino is the destroyed form of the positron of
the electron-positron pair of the vacuum, that is, the string of
the spiral of the positron is broken. The shock of the neutron
turning into the proton, that is, the inner electron of the
neutron taken out of the nucleon by electron-positron pair of the
vacuum, thereby turned inside-out to become the positron of the
proton, destroys the spiral string of the positron of the vacuum,
whose partner electron has clutched the inner electron of the
neutron.
So, one of the wave equations is that of an electron which is a Fermion:
(i)
The other wave equation is that of the electron-positron pair (in other words, that is the so-called “photon”) which is a Boson, because it is a combination of two Fermion electron-positron.
(j)
(i’)
(j’)
(m)
Please note that the first term comes from the electron, and the second from the electron-positron pair from which emerges the anti-neutrino. Please note that from (k) and (l), (m) can also be written:
(m’)
From (m) we get:
This means the
action, that is, the time derivative of energy, is zero. This
explains why the sum of kinetic energies of the electron and the
neutrino 
that Pauli talked about is constant. Moreover, my above reasoning
shows how that constant sum of energy is split between the
electron and the anti-neutrino, that is, between 
and 
, which are
deterministically determined at the exact space-time point. We
need No Probability & Statistics theories. We do not have to
take any average at all. Experimet shows 
And if we plot the number of
electrons as the vertical axis versus the kinetic energy of the
electron as the horizontal axis for beta decays repeated many
times, we get a graph whose peak is at a little less than 0.3 MeV:
is the commonly
observed angle of play (loosely rotatable angle without collision)
between the electron spiral and the positron spiral of the
electron-positron pair of the vacuum. That difference of the
angle 
is well deduced in the equation (m’) as the phase difference
between cosine and sine. The energy ratio between the electron
and the anti-neutrino is deterministically determined by the
exact mathematical time at which the spiral string of the
positron is broken.
III.Newton's inverse-square law derivable from Newton's third law & screw particles
Astonishingly, Newton's and Coulomb's inverse-square law, which are theories of fields, can be demonstrated based on Newton's Third Law of action/reaction, using the model of screw-structured particles along with the principle "One Rotation One Action". And from this theoretical demonstration, we can foresee its huge technological possibilities of application.
or 
(a)
For a screw, 
and 
do not mean the velocity
of linear motion but signify the Rotational velocity, more
precisely, the rotational velocity (not the angular velocity) of
a point on the rotating spiral of the screw. And this is the same
for the screw of the electron-positron pair of vacuum.
or (a)
For a screw, and do not mean the velocity
of linear motion but signify the the Rotational velocity (not the
angular velocity) of a point on the rotating spiral of the screw.
And this is the same for the screw of the electron-positron pair
of vacuum. Let us suppose that an object charged with positive
electricity and an object with negative electricity are located
at a distance 
first, then, reduce the distance
by half to 
. According to the principle
"One Rotation One Action", though the distance is half
now, the electron-positron pair of vacuum carrying the action
should quickly rotate one time, at a double velocity 
, where the "space-distance
grain" that is, the circular length (circumference) of the
spiral 
,
stays the same,
or 
. So 
which means 
Thanks to Newton's
third law, we can talk about the force or the acceleration with
the same space-distance grain and the different time grains 
and 
in time of interaction.
This signifies that the
interacting force, that is, Newton's gravity or Coulomb's
force, is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
Coulomb's inverse-square law corresponds to the first term of
Lorentz force.
III.1. Technological possibilities of energy extraction from the vacuum
We have seen
that if only we put electric charges in the space, when the space-distance
is reduced to 
, i.e., the space volume is
reduced to 
, the action becomes 
times more. And please
be aware that that energy is provided by the vacuum at each
moment of time. So if we fractally put a pair of the
aforementioned electric charges in each of subspaces which are of times reduced volume, in
the entire space, we get 
times more power, and so on. As
in the vacuum there are so many interacting pairs of an electron
and a positron, we can say that the vacuum has inexhaustible
energy.
The above reasoning demonstrates that perpetual motion is possible, where if only electric charges are put in the space, the energy for the action/reaction is provided by the vacuum. The energy possibly taken from those electrically charged objects is in the form of action, i.e., pushing/pulling force and rotational motion. Conventional physicists believed to have demonstrated that no perpetual motion is possible. However, they always wondered and secretly asked themselves why atomes and molecules are perpetually in motion.
IV. Space-time
relation 
derived from Newton's inverse-square
law
where 
is considered to be
constant in terms of 
and 
.
I solve this
differential equation, supposing is a function of . The result is:
(a) which shows the
space-time relation
Using the space-time
realtion and 
, I get mass-time relation:
(b)
IV.1. Einstein's "time-delay ratio" derivable from space-time relation
So that we can
freely set 
, 
, 
, etc, we set: 
.
To what extent
the internal physical action/reaction time 
of 
is delayed compared with the time
for the motion equation? I represent the delay in terms of the
physical velocity of motion: 
, 
As 
, so 
approximately.
Let us reason
around 
,
which signifies 
.
As 
, 
.
This is exactly the same ratio of time delay in terms of velocity as Einstein derived.
IV.2. Kozyrev's transmission velocity of action/reaction derived from space-time relation
I here use Coulomb force of an electron acting upon another electron, and get:
(a)
As Kozyrev's
equation of action transfer velocity is discretely for One Action,
I here use the one period of time of the physical time
oscillation, that is, 
from the moment of action
emission up to the moment of the reactor's receiving the action.
As the fine structure constant is defined as: 
, the equation (a) is
transformed into:
Thus Kozyrev's
equation 
is demonstrated.
IV.3. A. P. Smirnov's equation of many-body problem derived from space-time relation
From (a) and (b)
in Chapter IV., we get: 
(c)
We here consider ratio of different space distances and different mass:
and 
By Taylor
development of 
around a small 
, we put: 
If we put 
,
, 
,
, and 
, 
, 
, 
, and 
, we get: 
If only we
hypothesize:: 
, we get:
In the process
of phase transition of particles one by one, we can suppose that
the force or the flowing energy density found in a unit space
distance is constant. So the energy is proportional to its only
variable, that is, the space distance. If we use 
and 
instead, we get it for
only 3 discrete values: 
I will use this very useful relation of A. P. Smirnov, allowing anti-entropy, in learning in artificial intelligence and in a future computer architecture.
IV.4. 
shows a long distance
causes "red shift" at the farthest corner of universe
As 
or 
, 
(a)
If we suppose
that the light velocity is the same all over the universe, it is
reasonable to put: 
. So, in general, we can say:
As the farthest
corner of universe is very far away, the 
on the right-hand side of the
equation (a) should be extremely large, so the right-hand side
should be very small. In order to maintain the equality, the time
grain 
at the farthest corner of the universe should be very large,
which causes the extreme decrease of frequency, that is, red-shift
of light emitted by the stars near the end of the universe. So,
for the stars at the extreme far-end of the universe to red-shift,
no Doppler-effect is necessary. Only the extreme far
distance is sufficient. It is wrong for the conventional
physics, adepts of "big-bang theory", to believe that
the stars at the farthest corner of the universe is recessing at
a velocity now approaching the velocity of light, which,
according to them, causes the red-shift under Doppler effect.
V. Model of screw-structured particles
The vacuum, that
is, the ether, is an ocean of electron-positron pairs. It is a
rotating chain of electron-positron pairs of vacuum that mediates
the action/reaction.
The anti-clockwise
outer spiral of the electron represents a negative electrical
charge, and the clockwise outer spiral of positron a positive
electrical charge. The positive mass of the electron has
Clockwise inner spiral, and the negative mass of the positron has
Anti-clockwise inner spiral. The spiral strings of outer
electrical charge and of inner mass, forms a single ring. The
spirals of mass have far sparser windings than those of
electrical charge, because gravity is a force far weaker than
electrical force. We can say this according to the concept of
a lever and a screw. A neutrino is a destroyed form of the
spiral string. And in most cases, neutrinos are produced by
destroying the spiral string of the electron-positron pair of the
vacuum. In the electron-positron pair (which becomes "photon"
when located on a trajectory of light), the strings of electron
and that of positron are linked. A nucleon without an electron
nor a positron (though that does not normally exist) consists of
an almost straight outer line representing no electrical charge (which
will form the particle electron neutrino when separated.) and of
a long but sparsely winding inside mass spiral. A nucleon was
formed by spreading the linked spirals of electron/positron, thus
the outer zero-electric spiral is the spread string of the spiral
of the former electron and the inner mass spiral is the spread
string of the spiral of the former positron.
Though recently,
some researchers in Japan announced that neutrinos have mass, the
“mass” of a neutrino which is nothing but a broken string
should not be produced by the normal spiral mechanism of gravity,
and the experimentally measured value of “mass” will not
always be assured to be the same value. In other words, “mass
of a neutrino” believed to have the same value all the time is
a fake.
Conventional
physicists who have eagerly been looking for a Higgs' particle,
which, according to their theories, is a particle that GIVES Mass
to other particles, begin to complain these days why they do not
succeed in finding it. The reason is quite simple and clear. Such
a particle like Higg’s never exists, and their entire theories
that deduced its existence are a fake.
The reason why the orbital electron does not emit electromagnetic waves though accelerated (should emit when accelerated according to the theory of Maxwell’s electromagnetics) is as follows. When orbiting around the proton, the Axis of the Screw of the electron Points To the Proton, so that the orbital electron could be pulled by the centripetal force from the proton and could stably circulate around the orbit. Mawell’s electromagnetics should be modified to take into account that it is TYPICALLY WHEN the Direction of the Linear Motion of an electron and the Direction of the Screw AXIS of the electron are the SAME, that the electron emits electromagnetic waves, if accelerated, and otherwise not. In such a case that the direction of the screw axis of the electron is perpendicular to the direction of linear motion, even if the electron is accelerated, the electron will never emit electromagnetic waves. This mechanism can naturally be explained by the model of screw-structured particles. In order that an electromagnetic wave could be emitted, that is, all the chains of electron-positron pairs of the vacuum begin to rotate around their own parallel axes which should be parallel to the axis of the electron, the groove of the screw of the electron should clutch the groove of the screw of the electron-positron pair of the vacuum. But if the face of the groove of the rotating electron is pushing forward into the face of the grooves of the bundle of chains of electron-positron pairs of the vacuum, there is no way for the chains of the electron-positron pairs of the vacuum to generate concentric circles of waves in the vacuum, which is necessary for an emission of electromagnetic wave.
V.2. The model shows why molecules connected by electrons are stable
With the model
of screw-structured particles, I analyze the case of a hydrogen
molecule, more precisely how an orthohydrogen molecule is formed
and what structure is stably assured. I now reason the stability
of the screw-structured model and non-stability of the ball-structured
model.
In the ball-structured
model, if only one of the electrons slightly oscillates and
slightly deviates from the orbit, that is, the electron gets
slightly nearer to either of the two protons, the electron will
deviate still more toward the nearer proton at an accelerated
pace, and, having lost the balance, the entire structure of the
hydrogen molecule will immediately collapse.
On the contrary, the screw-structured model of electrons, protons, and the electron-positron pairs of the vacuum, is capable of assuring the stability of the structure of the molecule. In the following calculation of the screwed structure of the molecule, I simplified that the chaining between the electron and the proton by electron-positron pairs of the vacuum, that is, the "line of electric force" is a straight line and is not curved. But more in detail, the chaining, i.e., line of electric force is curved. Even with that simplification, you will see that the distance between the protons is rather precisely calculated in case of this screw-structured model. In reality more in detail, as the chaining of electron-positron pairs of the vacuum has the characteristic of trying to recover the straight line (because rotating tops in a chain will resist against zigzagging), which is verified by the fact that the light recovers straight trajectory even after being curved by gravity and by Akimov's and Shipov's experiment of straight communication trajectory, and which on the other hand, produces Faraday's so-called "pressure of electric field" or Dr. Jaroslav. G. Klyushin's "tensity", even if the screw-structured electron gets nearer to either of the protons, the stronger force trying to recover straight line will push the deviated electron back to the orbit located just in the middle. In other words, the stability of the orbit will be assured.
Centrifugal force produced only by the orbital revolution
According to the concept of Plank constant,
or 
Here I treat the
case where 
. The centrifugal force coming
from the orbital circular motion of the electrons is, as the
velocity is 
:
This centrifugal force and the two Coulomb centripetal forces that pull each of the electrons toward the protons are balanced, whence:
(a)
The resultant force of the Coulomb centripetal force addressed to the proton by the two electrons and the centrifugal force addressed to the proton by the other proton should not carry the proton toward the other proton, that is, the distance between the two protons should stay constant.
(b)
If we divide the equation (a) by (b),
Therefore the distance between the protons in the orthohydrogen is:
An experimental
value of the distance is 
, which is near to it..
V.3. Screw model shows "strong-interaction" is electromagnetic & why "quark" appears
H. Yukawa
believed it necessary to suppose special "strong interaction"
inside an atom. His theory was based on a ball-structured proton
and neutron in the entire volume of the nucleons of which a
positron and an electron distributed probabilistically, and he
never expected that the real distance between the positron of the
proton and the electron of neutron is 10 times smaller than he
had expected. Because of that wrong belief, he created the entire
fake theories, which gave birth to quantum chromodynamics.
The reason why
centripetal force periodically increases and decreases in "quark"
phenomenum, as we try to pull the neutron and the proton away for
a certain distance, is that the electron captured inside the
mass spiral of the neutron hooks at each roll of the mass spiral,
and strings of the spirals of nucleons work like "springs",
thus producing centripetal force of Hookean elasticity, as it is
dragged toward the final dead end exit. When the electron
stops at one roll of the mass spiral, the positron of the proton
is as close to the captured electron just like the electron-positron
pair “annihilated” into the vacuum, so the centripetal force
is almost null. But as we pull the positron of the proton
away to some distance, this effect of “annihilated” electron-positron
pair fades away, and the real electrical action/reaction of
centripetal force takes place between the captured electron and
the positron.
V.4. Second term of Lorentz force, dynamic field theory, explaind by screw model
The last chapter can be seen as the one that describes the first term of Lorenz force, because the objects are not initially in motion. Now I explain the second term of Lorentz force, which observes Fleming's law of the left hand.
Indeed, the
second term of Lorentz force is not produced by a simple
clutching mechanism of the screw-structured particle that we
normally find in other kinds of interaction processes. In this
case, the flow of electrons is discontinuously redirected by the
screw mechanism but at the moment of redirection, it is the
clutching groove of the rotating screw that exerts the force of
redirection. 
in the equation of Newton's third
law for the case of a process in a field is not the velocity of a
linear motion but is a rotational velocity. In the case of the
second term of Lorentz force too, the two "velocities"
that participate in forming the force of the second term, are the
rotational velocity of the free electron and that of the electron-positron
pair of vacuum, which sends forward the rotating chain of
electron-positron pairs, that is, "magnetic line of force".
A magnetic flux is also a rotating (i.e., moving forward) chain
of electron-positron pairs of vacuum, produced when electricity (set
of electrons) really flows.
Here, using the screw-structured model, I explain the mechanism how the second term of Lorentz force is produced. Its quantity is well precisely defined by the Lorentz formula. I show how that direction of the force is inevitably produced.
In the first figure, the current of an electron which is an anti-clockwisely rotating anti-clockwisely winding screw with its axis pointing to the direction of motion, touches from above the anti-clockwisely rotating (i.e., advancing) chain of anti-clockwisely winding electron-positron pair screws of the magnetic line of force. The current of the electron is pushed back, by the anti-clockwisely rotating spiral of the electron-positron pair of vacuum, in the direction opposite to that of that current. The electric current trying to pass the upper side has difficulty to pass through.
In the second figure, the current of an electron which is an anti-clockwisely rotating anti-clockwisely winding screw with its axis pointing to the direction of motion, touches from beneath the anti-clockwisely rotating (i.e., advancing) chain of anti-clockwisely winding electron-positron pair screws of the magnetic line of force. This electric current of the electron is promoted forward, by the anti-clockwisely rotating spiral of the electron-positron pair of vacuum, in the same direction as that of the original electric current. The electric current passing beneath is promoted to pass through.
This promotion
of letting the electric current pass beneath and the prohibition
of passing upper side, is the reason why the electron
arriving at the upper side of the magnetic line receives a force
directed downward which in fact is physically exerted by the
coming-downward (because rotating anti-clockwise) side of the
magnetic line spiral facing the arrived electron. This is exactly
the direction defined by the outer product of 
and 
: 
.
V. Opposite chyralities of DNA and protein help anti-entropy processes
DNA has a clockwise double-helical structure, which should enable DNA to efficiently capture the universal spiral wave coming from proteins having anti-clockwise helical structure, which is an anti-entropy processes. Moreover, DNA, when two ends connected, forms a Moebius band, which should allow to control the time. Spiral waves are observed in signal transmission along neural networks. Neural network forms Klein’s tube. These objects of non-orientable topology, both of relatively high electrical conductivity, can generate consecutive entropy decrease, freely controlling the time.
REFERENCES: