Special Notes:

Also by providing gyro (or gyros) geometrically mounted so that the wheel masses may pass through the radial line of the major arc displacement during the two ‘O’ gyro points (wheel plane parallel to the major arc plane) the pass through will reverse the major arc back torque so that a directional continuity of motion/force will continuously net out controllable vehicular travel.

a) A physical beam;

b) A curved track (rail);

d) An inertialized system -- not accomplished satisfactorily yet.

3) Resultant motion in major arc plane;

a) That is wavy;

b) That is linear (with free precessional rotation);

c) That is either continuous or oscillating.

6) The wheel spin and powered precession rate are coordinated for

maximized rate of motion (power).

Gyroscope Precession And Arc Mass Motion Why an angularly displaced spinning wheel translates 90° (free) or helicly (forced)

There are two basic velocity (vectors) in temporal time:

1) Gyro mechanics - usable power/motion (Torsional):

Reactionless

Self Ratioing ‘gear’ motor

2) Inertia Mechanics Demonstrated:

Inertia/Induced Motoring -- Tumble/Spin

By: 1) Self in a structure/system - very efficient

2) Outside frequency control

3) Gyro Universe Forming Time-Energy Basics:

Uncaused Cause (Plan)

Light (+) - Matter - Motion - Motion & Matter - Motion

Ultimate Cause-Effect:

Energy Continuum

Conservation of Total of All Energies Incorporated in Temporal Time

This report’s purpose is to journalize a science dialog of observations of gyroscopic actions in various system configurations; with specifically applied forces and the resulting (re)action(s). The scope of the report covers the demonstration apparatus used with some mechanical projections. Also, some intuited usages are proposed - particularly in the induced cyclic possibilities that would include inertialized enhancements for linear travel of a system that breaks through gravitational unity. Further, the scope is extended into both time-mass transfer properties possibilities, and the basis (orbit’s force theory) of mass formation -- Also the mechanics of inertia may be gyroscopically demonstrated.

After the resistance anomaly, torsion is not only the keyword - it may well be the only word for the auto accommodating power transfer conversion from (singular and dual) torque inputs to a gyro (powered rotor wheel with & without powered precession). There is a double-torque plane system that will multiply, and distribute output within 3 RPMs ratioed while accommodating the opposing load(s). These three RPMs need mass, speed/time, and power ratio development for practicable usages -- then there is the 4th dimension of powered precession that can move a gyro system -- and a 5th dimension that when precession is held in a plane that is controlled (powered) in sympathy with an oscillation frequency, as if powering precession, then wheel spin acceleration can be induced.

1. The wheel (the major spin plane) RPM (+mass).
2. Arcuate angular displacement of the major spin plane.
3. Arcuate angular precession in a plane 90° to the major arc plane.
4. Powering the rate of precession will feedback to the major arc radial.
5. Including the vehicle in the major arc element will serve to effect the motion of the vehicle.
6. Timing the passage of the wheel plane through the major arc radial during the parallel periods facilities the efficiency of the motion -- but is not necessary for continuous motion as that can happen because of the torque efficiency differential and inertia when the mass stays in the same major arc.

There would also be time relative laws of mass transferring in a zero point torsion activity.

The real question...Is there a “free energy” amplification?...

This seems to have a simple two-letter answer...__ __!!

But there is an in-space torsional traction that can be powered & inertially levered for linear motion. We may not (yet) achieve space (or antigravity) travel on inertially levered gyro propulsion; but we have gyro propulsion on certain terms and positioning. Newton’s Laws need some interpolation/extrapolation (at least a corollary) when it comes to mass spin energies/inertias transmittals of gyro power systems - or maybe even, hopefully, a fourth Law that allows spin time-power trades with mass repositioning; i.e. the drawing-in of nature’s basic orbits force system in the time-mass-motion spectrum through an arcuate based stable (spatial) force plane. This force plane appears to be given into arc motion as integratable into a helicly-based travelling torque system processing that can be defined/charted for power/motion outputs. These outputs can include wheel tumbling (motoring) or wheel(s) spin (motoring) -- possibly both happening together either naturally in a structure or by powering and natural (but guided) precession by forcing the precessional plane to follow a (naturally) desired path (and frequency).

The conservation of energy may be becoming a conceptual constraint because our energy scope is too narrow. The known time-motion-mass inter-relativities can only behave within our perspecality capabilities. The incapabilities to advancement can fall with less intellectual effort as more and more physics insights are broadened…

1. Slightly expanded understanding of the energy continuum?:

1. Time may be the carrier/disbursement means into motion and mass.
2. Time carries the origin energy.
3. Not all the origin energy goes from time to mass & motion.

1. Expanded Further??:

1. The origin energy is composed in coloidal modulating distributions that are never able to exceed the origins contents.
2. The origins content is the imposition of arc (spin) and its gyro plane energy as a net energy allocation from a total of all energies available in temporal (mass & motion) time.

1. Metaphysical???:

1. Temporal time macro (energy compost) includes the original will (or plan) to differentialize itself into a micro of temporal time (-- or balanced opposing micros).
2. The plan energy executed of itself into a knowledge (power) metering.
3. The knowledge transmits by means of ‘temporal’ time energy flowing of ‘gyro’ (spin) energy formulated through: ether…light…and mass-motion

…”conservation of energy” can only be complete when all energy allotted into temporal time is accounted for, and the energy continuum is thus broadened.

These demonstrations may at least provide insights toward clearer understandings of a next era of gyro-inertial fields-involved power systems (including making ‘gravity’ and anti-gravity) – made up of compounded etheral” sub & atomic, molecular, mass (through all intra-galactic integrations) arc motions…also being the fundamental universe (mass/motion/energy) –forming basic!?

BACKGROUND

A GYRO IS...

• A many faceted, spatially-stabilized torque (orbital) geometrics phenomenon.
• An energy device that has a load-bearing, force-seeking, spatially-anchored stability reference.
• A double-torque plane system with many multiples of wheel weight power available as distributable from the powered major arc (wheel spin plane) to the free (arc) plane of precession.
• A two plane torque system that will sense the loadings, and distribute commensurate torque variable/self adjusting ratio (?gear?).
• A near to linear motion device when the precession arc of the wheel is powered and the major arc involved mass has momentum; and in which the torque action is pivotally ratioed and controlled (guided) so that the major arc plane is essentially flat.
• When in a cluster mounted assembly (with free single-plane centered gimballing), a motorization of one or more gyros occurs from precessional frequency communication of other gyros in the structure. The motoring may be wheel tumbling or spinning. Both actions are inertial in nature; but tumbling gets satisfied while wheel spin acceleration doesn’t get to a climax.
• A time-torque metering system.
• A strong tendency toward zero time wheel mass transfer action -- especially the bumping/”tumbling” initial “motoring” or alignment reaction.

NOTES:

4. Conversely to note 3, forced precession power increases can increasingly, with higher major arc loading, extend the torque reaction time (period) feed back to the major wheel plane displacement rate – in other words, varying the powered precession can vary the time & weight (load carrying) and 4^th dimension motion.
5. Allowing powered precession a full 360° turning reverses the major arc torsion every 180° (unless the wheel plane passes through the line of the major arc radial) -- the easiest time for this is when the axial/radial line of the precessional arc is 90° to the plane of the major arc. (Note: Try this when a wheel plane(s) not perpendicular to major arc radial.
6. One of the two angular wheel displacement planes must be essentially ‘free’ to precessionally react to the displacement of the other.
7. Nearly linear motion can occur when the precessional torsion system has powered ‘zero’ moment arm from the wheel plane to the total precessional mass inertial centroid axis, on a very long and single plane major arc radius.
8. Generally, the major arc is the most loaded or powered and the precessional arc is the least loaded or powered; or torus (helical) motion is included in the precessional arc motion.
9. Powering precession (back feeding energy) to the major arc has no ‘bumping’(motoring) and may be very efficient -- certainly more efficient than the opposite power flow (re: more power to major arc rotational than to minor arc rotation). Powering major arc vs. powering minor arc is causing negative inertial vs. causing positive power.
10. Small (seemingly no) major arc motion can produce extended minor precessional arc travel.
11. A gravity altering vortex (helical gyroscopic mass spin mode) can occur when the whirling mass is fluid - or particalized. The whirlpool (nature’s anti and augmented gravity weather-making device) is a rising or falling helix that may get its lift from an effective gyro fulcrum displacement, now known as coreolis force. This torus systemized motion is in reality many multiple associations of gyroscopic interplay. This of course is the complex arc-energy relationship that occurs in nature and in all probability is the basic building principle of energy as expressed in the time-motion-matter anomaly called gravity.
12. The back spin such as might be induced into the #10’s low and high pressure weather systems -- that are gyro systems with the major arc focus far out on the line of the earth’s axis (Note 1: That the northern southern direction is the line of wheel spin passage maintains motion towards the earth’s center combined with precessional “with” guidance by the earth’s surface and friction for precessional power and atmospheric depth for helix directional (vehicular) freedom. Note 2: That the weather low pressure spin is in the same rotational and system travel as water in the sink -- Also with the same wheel passage principle through the major arch radius (showed different systems) in different hemospheric have the same (downward) motion but with a reverse in angular rotation (visa versa for the high pressure systems – and water spouts???)).
13. Planetary tilts and equinox passages could be induced spin power and orbital conditions of zero (or anti) gravity.
14. The plane of the wheel(s) positioning has a range seemingly from .00.........1° to 89,999999....9° where it will have consistent behavior -- in other words the ‘passage’ can happen in a very small angular period, but will then keep the same torque characteristic for very nearly a full 90°.

What if every electron in every atom in every mass on earth had a major arc deflection radius focused essentially below a tangential line from its position on the earth keeping it in an orbit system that is falling relative to a rotating radial from the earth’s center, with powered precession possibly inducted by the change of the spin axis of the earth’s rotation in a held plane while held (orbiting the earth’s center by the earth’s surface; with a system (vehicle) path biased towards the center of the earth (note this bias is really the seeking of a lower orbit as there really can be no direct travel by a ‘falling’ body towards the earths center - due simply to a body “falling” from a higher orbit (bigger circumference) to a smaller circumference, while maintaining a constant tangential speed).

The ‘above’ a tangential line major arc deflection focus would displace that system (vehicle) away from the earths gravitational system -- probably to associate with another gyro system ( it would take opposite spinning electrons to come back -- but that would be antimatter to earths matter ...bad, very bad).

(Sun orbit is a major arc focal point).

A GYRO IS NOT:

• A free going linear propulsion device without specific torque inertially fulcrumed arc-plane geometrics - the wheel cannot be gimballed in planes (in a straight line) that includes the center of gravity of the wheel, when guided precessional motion is intended; though its spatially stable torque properties still happen in this mounting configuration.
• A field communication device - but multiple gyros mounted on one structure will display intra-definitive sympathetic precessional spin harmonies.

• Capable of energy translation when there is no precessional (arc) travel, i.e. fixing the axis of the wheel into only one arc-travel plane will eliminate the gyroscopic torsion phenomenon.
• A free energy device; nor will it amplify input energy other than in an induced gear motor like ratioed input-output.
• A free (space) unguided lifting device - one end of the torque arm transmits the “lifted” weight through to a supporting (or inertialized) major arc force base -- but the torque arm can be focused to a distant point and it is possible to reverse the torque during the 90° wheel plane to major arc transition(s) -- producing pulsing but directionally planned arculate travel of a vehicle.

1. Major Arc force with:

1. Fixed arm (that entirely precesses).
2. Broken arm (major arc stays planar).

1. Precessional powered arc motion with free variably loaded major arm travel:

1. <180° rotation & single torsion direction of major arc.

1. #2 with timed wheel centroid passage thru major arc radius.

1. Ratioed torque (with varying geometry manipulations, and many multiples - gear motor like) of major arc force into minor arc (precessional torque. (NOTE: a 1¾ HP input to a 20 lb. Wheel can ‘snap’ a 5/8” diameter wheel shaft - in an instant after responding to a major arc torque loading.

3. Linear travel - in precessional axis plane:

1. With manipulated precession.
2. With inertially effected precession.

4. Pump - in major arc plane:

1. With powered 360° precession.
2. Manipulated (oscillating) precession.

5. Centrifugal/centripetal mass energy changes (cancellations - or potential energy accumulations?):

1. Fixed major arc:

1. Free precession has centrifugal force removed (relayed or delayed?).
2. Powered precession seems to delay centrifugal force, and transfer it to radial after reaching 90° wheel rotation dead gyro position.

2. Broken major arc:

1. 360° precession with torsionally modified centrifugal force during dynamic period, but an inertial surge linearly along the major arc radial during dead (parallel action) period.
2. 180° arc segments precession reversal of major arc direction under precession power.

5. A self-induced spin plane energy communication through its structure from one or more gyros to another; altering the precessional action from oscillation to rotation.
6. An immediate (possible zero time-mass-motion) positioning to a gyro force canceling (90° axes planes) when free precession is allowed -- this is an opposing force back feed to the origin force for what may be a mechanical demonstration of inertia.
7. An immediate (possible zero time-mass-motion canceling?) cessation of precession when the major arc axis is unloaded.
8. Except for an initial (inertial line ) resistance precession is a reactionless (or may be timeless) torque activity.
9. A reversible polarizing (parallel axes direction finding) of a gimballed wheel group of gyros that are mounted on radial spokes and rotated -- moving through inertial into magnetics ( -- a transiting from power through inertia to magnetics).

Notes:

1. There are obviously many speed ratio rules to be ascertained.
2. Virtually all actions are gravity affected in some manner (a freely rotating/precessing wheel will adjust its rate of turn to the load, as to orbit the load in a neutralized gravity plane).
3. A gyro force system may be the basics of mass-motion energy.
4. A gyro network (random assembly) may be demonstrating the mechanics of inertia (through magnetism; electricity...etc). The gyro is not so much space ‘traction’ -- as it is a torsional mass (inertia) handling ( -- as part of a reactionless torque system) and substituting motion energy for time/mass energy ( -- wants to be all (sublight) motion -- zero time arcs system translations). It is a (reactionless 90° tangential centroiod track transfer) satisfaction of randomly positioned multiple arc motion change energies in their precessional reaction. It doesn’t matter about the ‘wheel’ plane alignment to impose resistance that occurs initially as far at the overall work of precession is concerned. Inertia may be the chaos of mass gyro particles force planes displacement energies: 1) alignment (‘bump’ of spinning mass reaction to arc plane displacement) 2) precession as angular molecular/atomic force (d) precession is a mass realignment period to an arc change (force) which is either a timeless ‘wannabe’ or a distance less ‘wannbe’ -- all arcs displacement has available side effects of energy: ‘inertia’; motion, force (from torque), motoring of the wheel plane and the wheel itself.

1. No gyroscopic activity (dead weight) when precession is prevented - or has its wheel plane motion in its same single plane.
2. No precession from a major arc displacement after minor arc motion reaches 90° to the major arc axis motion plane.
3. No activity when equal counter-rotating gyros are on the major arc axis - even if the major arc is essentially free in space.
4. No activity when major arc and minor arc are mechanically directly linked.

DEMONSTRATION HARDWARE SYNOPSIS:

11 manual/powered machines (also including 6 ‘toy’ gyros and 1 bicycle wheel), where all 3 RPMs are variable and reversible, air motor driven gyros with variable speed major wheel turn, and air motor or manual or free precession actions. The wheels vary in mass from 1.6 to 19.6 lbs. The final two machines have guidance for linear precessional propulsion, both in horizontal and vertical (anti-gravity) directions. Multiple gyros in a structure to demonstrate gyro interplay.

DEMONSTRATIONS:

A. ‘4 - Spoke’

1. Description: 4 spokes with single-gimbal gyros on the outer end (‘Satellites’) of each spoke - manual turn of assembly. Spokes are adjustable and pivotable; gyros can be held in various positions. (Free to translate on major axis; gyros mounted with gimbal axes 30° to spoke radii).
2. Purpose: an attempt to obtain linear action from rotation of the assembly.

3. Actions:

1. Uninduced but stable incessant rotation of one gyro, whose axis is nearly parallel in an easterly direction (a ‘moon’ if you will), and which seems to be caused by inertical (or alignment energy) frequency of the other 3 gyros self-induced disharmonious oscillation; this disharmony is not perfectly stable (irregular), and may be due to the possibility that the gyros are indeed (slightly!) off-center;
2. Also observable is a minuscule rotation/counter-rotation of the whole assembly;
3. the range of oscillation of the opposite gyro appears to be ‘corrective’ to maintain the full rotation of the opposing gyros power input changes.
4. we can manipulate the frequency and a much more rapid motorization of some/one/all of the gyros can be induced.
5. the above contains noticeable resistance while the system is initially accelerated -- also the precessional ‘bumping’ that is an immediate response to any gyro rotation plane change appears to join in a power frequency oscillation that is transmitted to the other gyros in the system.
6. there is no linear motion of the assembly which was the original intent.

B. ‘6 - Satellite’

1. Description: 6-satellite single gimbal gyros on air motor powered major wheel hub; pendulum held assembly for either horizontal or vertical major wheel turning plane (pendulum) hung freely on a vertical cable that is motorized to raise and lower the assembly.

3 modes:

a. 6 satellites spin (natural and induced gimballing);

b. Major wheel spin, and satellites’ spin;

c. Major wheel spin without satellites’ spin.

2. Purpose: to observe the multiple arcuate travels that would possibly simulate atomic, molecular, solar, galactic arc-plane interchange possibilities on the satellites; and the assembly.
3. Actions: (satellites’ gyros spinning but major wheel not rotating):

1. ‘Communication’ between machine’s elements that causes various motor-like rotations of the satellites (gyros wheel plane rotation) in some form of sequence (the ones that ‘want’ to become motors seem to be in the same easterly axis as in the case of A;
2. When the whole assembly initiates spin in one direction, all the gyros face (polarize so that the gyro wheel plane is in the same plane of rotation as this assembly - or if a rotation of the plane of the assembly occur, then they settle at the helix angle of the track of the satellites), the same way immediately and all at once. Likewise, when the whole assembly is spun in the opposite direction the gyros behave the same way, except that they face the exact opposite direction (parallel axes of major and minor wheels);
3. Self-induced or manual oscillations of the entire assembly will motorize self-selected satellites in a selected direction of rotation depending on the half initialization cycle;
4. When we add putting the whole moving assembly into an (third) arc motion (in an arc via a cable attached to the ceiling), chaotic displacement of the system occurs.

Work = Fxd

t

These equations must begin to accommodate transitions of infinite/ultimate & zero time; ultimate & zero mass & ultimate & zero motion & ‘gyro’ atomic/molecular alignments reactions that are time-energy relative transients ... leading to understanding!!...time eternal as differentiated into: knowing (will of a plan); light; motion; matter (& reversed back into time)...all being in/of temporal (gyro forces) time...all of the arc motion integral in its given force planes (s)... as the basis of temporal time formations/existence: ether (knowledge) - particulate (light) - atomic - molecular - planetary - galactic... all ‘motorized’, in & of gyroscopic helix traveling(s),

F = p x t F = I = P = (if no v) d = t (if no v)

d

p = m t = displacement Energy of Arc plane mass, E

t (Large intuit leap here)

Force is displacement of (gyro particles in) mass.

Force is displacement & chaotic change of (arc planes/gyro) particles.

Time (temporal) is relative mass motions in time.

‘All’ mass is zero motion in ultimate mass time.

‘All’ motion is zero mass in ultimate motion time.

Light is a transition out of mass energy.

‘All’ light is ultimate motion in zero mass time.

‘All’ dark is ultimate mass in zero motion time.

Zero light is zero knowledge time in zero mass/motion time.

Time in origin(al) eternal time as m & o become ‘o’, t increases in its relative (plan) energy.

categories need some kind of mathematical representation.

Then E = gyro energy + time

In all mass time power is mass energy with its total energy internalized in its gyro particles -- atoms.

• There is time without motion and there is time without mass (there is time without both the time or motion and time of mass)

Phase transitions from inertia conversations into magnetism, electricity, radio...light use gyro forces paid by changes in time (for mass & motion regenerations)

Pwr is mass energy and its speed of its arc plane rotation + its internal gyro energy disbursed into motion + time (power) change

a is precessional emition (realignment energy) of force

work = F x d d is displacement in time

(Time was the total force with change of status as it transitions to become...motion & mass...)

= F (in zero motion time) + gyro force origin (plan force in ‘O’ mEg

Note: the question: (based on the opinion that gyroscopic (molecular/atomic) alignments to displacement of the mass arc plane is a zero time action -- it wants to be either a zero time or zero mass transfer -- but it is of inertia during the reaction period which is felt (in time) as a ‘bumping’ until alignment takes place and precession smooths out then in a self force accommodation to the outside loading) is then ‘c’ (speed of light +?O-?) a zero mass (or time) occurrance that then is the ’E’ of inertial (gravity) power/resistance.

C. ‘Gyro-Dolly’

1. Description: two 1.6-lb. air motor driven gyros, multi-positionable, opposed mounted, spring loaded on swivel mounts and attached to a rotating (air motor driven) bar - the entire apparatus is placed on a ball-wheel platform that is free to move in any direction. Average gyro speed here is 3000 RPM on ½ HP air motors. Spring attachments are variable in the plane of precession.

2. Purpose: to observe horizontal motion on a smooth surface.

3. Actions:

a. Barely recognizable (very poor!) linear motion on the floor;

b. Oscillating action in a curved direction.

4. Interpretations: this is what is known as a bust. No further

investigation of this device is intended at the present time.

D.-A. ‘Gyro-Pump’

1. Description: one or two 1.6 lb. gyros driven by ½ HP air motors (assembly) on a fixed-mount base. Manually and free precession operated rocker arm (optionally spring loaded). Two rotatable platform mounted gyros and two rocker configurations (single or double plane rocker action).

1. Purpose: To observe single and multiple wheel’s action on a basically fully free swiveling system with manual and mechanical inputs into the major arc and precessional arc rates.

3. Actions:

1. (free turning) Very many and variable responses to powering major/minor arc including increased weightlifting capacity when precession is accelerated;
2. (linkage) none - the linkage, even though it was highly variable did not find (or allow) the desired result (major arc torque control);
3. (power) very positive action, i.e. the first 180° of precession would force the arm one way, and the second 180° of precession would force the arm one way, and the second 180° of continued rotation would power the major arm in the opposite direction;
4. full 360° cycle would be two-way pump action capable of many lifting many multiples of wheel weight. A very short precessional arm would still provide vigorous action -- even when the wheel mass was directly over the powered precessional pivot.
5. Two gyro’s mounted on powered precession appeared to double the power if incompatable spin/location harmony.

1. This is a reactionless (that is no torque is transmitted to or from the structure).
2. Powered precession introduces a fourth perimeter/dimension for wheel spin; major arc inputted; precessional arc and major arc output with powered precession.
3. When the precession is powered and the major arc planes held then spin energy can be induced back into the wheels.

1. Interpretations: this device looks to be a useful mechanical power device as the pumping action could accommodate increased loadings automatically. This set up can act as an open beam crank engine.

D.-B. Double Pivoted Coreolis

1. Description: Same mounting wheels and motor, and pivot beam but with a double gyro assembly on a powered pivoted yoke on one end of the major arc beam, that permits the two single plane gyros to pass through the major arc radial line (parallel to the physical beam) when in powered precession.
2. Purpose:

1. To obtain continuous arc motion by oscillating the gyros as they pass through the no gyro (wheels parallel to the plane of the major arc plane) positions (twice in each full 360° precessional turn; and
2. To find if this geometrics can be imposed into a vehicle for substantially linear travel.

3. Actions:

1. There is a vigorous pumping if there is no passage of the plane of the gyros through the radial line of the major arc and
2. The reversal (pumping) will not occur if the passage is accomplished -- so the major arc motion will become continuously unidirectional.

4. Interpretations:

1. It appears that this pulsing continuous action can be applied to a vehicle; (such as J.-B);
2. The plane passage requires only overcoming the small inertial resistance of the pivoting mass -- only during the no gyro positions;
3. The flat (perpendicular to the major arc plane) wheel position as opposed to the vertical wheel make no action difference;
4. There may only be a minute angular change of alignment with the major arc radial to effect the torque reversal (from powered precession);
5. The so called coreolis force change from the northern hemisphere to the southern hemisphere appears to have the same geometric gyro characteristics as seen in spiraling water going down a drain -- or even more interesting is the reversed weather spirals of lows and highs that move down and up in the northern vs. southern hemisphere. The planes of the spin are passing through the spin axis of the earth while the weather is being forced precessionally by surface friction with the earth. The weather has depth (of atmosphere) which is the major arc motion of the system I don’t know why the radial line is pointed along the earth’s radial line, but the tilt of the earth may figure into the spiral of the earth sun rotational plane helixing axially with the galactic system.

E. ‘Moon-Wheel’

1. Description: a 20-lb. wheel on 1¾ HP air motor configured on single or double (rocker) arms. 60” long rocker with linear free horizontal slide (90° to rocker action) optional. Also, a manually precessable (rotating) rocker (major arc) end mount alternative with adjustable precess radius - assembly mounted on fixed base.

a. Mode 1

i. Single swivel plane rocker and fixed gyro,

ii. ‘i.’ with linear slide (optional).

b. Mode 2

i. Single swivel plane rocker with broken precess pivot arm (12” from end of rocker arm),

ii. ‘i.’ with linear slide (optional).

c. Mode 3

i. Double swivel plane rocker and fixed gyro,

ii. ‘i.’ with linear slide (optional).

d. Mode 4

i. Double swivel plane rocker and broken precess pivot arm,

ii. ‘i.’ with linear slide (optional).

e. Mode 5

i. Single swivel plane rocker with gyro mounted on 360° swivel,

ii. ‘i.’ with linear slide (optional).

f. Mode 6

i. Double swivel plane rocker with gyro mounted on 360° swivel,

ii. ‘i.’ with linear slide (optional).

Modes 5 & 6 are rigged to lift extra weight with forced precession applied.

2. Purpose: same as D with heavier wheel and thus more forces involved and a linear travel possibility; also to observe the mass transfer of the wheel effect.

3. Actions:

1. Very strong torque (over 400 ft-lbs) resulted in snapping a 5/8” shaft;
2. Centrifugally, the wheel apparently moves through a sector with a modification or at least a transfer of the centrifugal force action to the next sector 90° (wheel parallel to the major arc plane where a lateral centripetal surge along the major arc plane occurred;
3. A linear action occurred when another swivel plane (lateral) was added to the major and precessional minor arc swivels;
4. Manually powered single or broken major arm precession could cause many multiples of wheel weight major arc torque lifting;
5. Various fulcrum positions demonstrated specific time rate weight lifting ratios that need further experiments to determine;
6. When the precession fixing attempt was made, very small motion still occurred and again produced over 400 ft-lbs. of precessional torque;
7. Breaking the major arc at the tip for free 360° precessional rotation allows for much more machine work versatility;
8. Motorization of the precession alone can be made to happen by pumping the major arc as required;
9. When spinning the non-rotating wheel assembly, the centrifugal normal display does not occur when the wheel is spinning.

F. ‘GyroLift-Rig’

1. Description: a 7-lb. wheel on ½ HP air motor fixed to free major arc vertical plane (on a horizontal pivot with wheel mass set directly in the center of the precessional arc, 1/3 HP air gear motor driven the precessional arc about a vertical axis - adjustable counterbalancing/weighting - with a mounting option for observing centrifugal/centripetal forces (not shown)).
2. Purpose: to show the variable torque arm emanating from a zero travel (but pivoting) precessional action; also the lifting capability is faithfully controlled by the precessional spin rate.
3. Action: a 7-lb. wheel in slower range powered precession with major arc freedom exerted over 50 ft-lbs. of torque back into the major arc/arm for lifting/counterbalancing or other work applications.

G. ‘Double-Wheel’

1. Description: a double wheel, counter directionally spinning gyro set - 1.6 lb. on each ½ HP air motor, gyro alternative (possible free mass transfer configuration), hung freely on a cable with a scale in the cable and the period of swing set to equal the weight of the two-wheels.
2. Purpose: to find free (reduced centrifugal force) mass transfer of double spinning gyros.

3. Actions:

1. No measurable reduction in centrifugal force;
2. The gyro phenomenon appeared to be canceled -- into structure stress.
3. One wheel had three (out of four) spoke breaks -- apparently due to internal structural stress.

H. ‘Flywheel’

1. Description: a 1¾ HP 2500 RPM 16 lb. single gyro hung from a cable pulley pendulum.
2. Purpose: to determine a coreolis change in the gravity of the spinning wheel that is pointed in the direction of rotation of the earth so that the top half is rotating with; and the bottom half back from the spin of the earth.
3. Action: Indecipherable measurement.

I. Guided ‘Propulsion’

1. Description: one (or two) 1.6 lb. wheel on ½ HP air motor, spinning in the same direction, fixed to free swingline vertical plane major arc (that is manually rotated) with a horizontal, precessional arc pivot that is free to travel (linearly) along a horizontal axis - with the mass center of the wheel located on a very short moment arm with a much longer (inertially loaded) opposite arm. The precession action about a pivot that is on the major arc bar is in an arc but the assembly must helicly follow the linear shaft -- various inertial/counter force placements are possible.

1. Purpose: to show/find that a gyro can be made to travel linearly with powered major arc rotation and free-swinging but inertialized precessional swing system -- the assembly then will have forced linear motion along a guided or controlled path.
2. Actions: a sideways traveling major arc, whose action also moves with the precessional plane direction of rotation; forming a helical complex between major arc and precessional arc that results in linear travel of the assembly in a composite of both planes -- but only during the period of the precessional arc.

Notes:

1. This of course is the helix found in the swirl origins of planet/mass (particles) formation that ends up in the satellite planetary motion, and the plants ultimate spin in the direction and plane of its origin’s swirl.
2. The acceleration of this system appears infinite and it is a moving space traction (reactionless) phenomenon.

J. Horizontal & Vertical Propulsion

1. Description: a high ‘goodness’ 12-lb. wheel on a 1¾ HP air motor mounted as a linear travel assembly similar to ‘I’.
2. Purpose: to find horizontal motion and over unity anti-gravity (vertical motion) power.
3. Actions: a horizontal, torque induced, travel, similar to I occurred. Approximately ¾” pulse of spatial traction torus lift (of 50-lb. assembly). This precessional lift was induced by the interplayed helix-like motion that was manually powered to the long precession arm -- although an attempt was made to avoid a ground based lever arm weight carry transfer we believe some torque transfer occurred.

Notes:

1. The inertial resistance imposed in ‘I’ and ‘J’ was done manually and took considerable action of the arm.
2. During the experiment, the wheel ripped itself loose from six ¼” diameter well-impregnated welds.

J.-B. Vehicular Travel

1. Description: Same as J-A except precessional spin was prevented (first by clamping and second by remounting the the end of a journal mounted shaft) and the vechile itself was the precessional travel by turning (steering) the wheels to provide the arc -- finally timing the wheel steering with the major arc cycles.
2. Purpose: To obtain vehicular travel.
3. Action: Pulsating and wavy travel obtained.

J.-C;-D-...etc.

K. ‘Bouncing Gyro’

1. Description: a ½ HP 3000 RPM 1.6 lb. single gyro hung from a long soft spring.
2. Purpose: to measure a motion field (pre-magnetic/electric) inertial communication from other gyros held and moved nearby.
3. Action: none perceived.

SPEED RATIOS:

1. Free Accommodation: Wheel RPM/mass; major arc angular: minor arc angular.
2. Force Of Precession; major arc angular: minor arc angular and major arc lifting

LOADING/POWER DISTRIBUTION RATIOS: Major arc load: minor arc power; or major arc power: minor arc load.

Lifting by force of precession, travel by placing vehicle in major arch mass and back powering (motoring) either wheel spin and/or rotation/tumbling -- note there seems to be inertial type resistance in the tumbling mode reaction with or without back feeding wheel spin acceleration.

We struggle for (and against) a beginnings logic, within which apparently (so far, at least) we have no intellectual linkage available to jump backwards from being to pre-being. Most theorists seem to be groping from a time-field (that we are in) to some pre-time (eternal) situation. Our presumption is that the time eternal static (which holds the plan + the force of plan*execution) when made into time temporal through a knowledge force ether; then progressing into the motion-mass spectrum might be simplistically viewed in the splitting differential or opposing “micro-potentialities” from a relatively “static macro”. So the origin would be the splitting of an arcuately set time micros from the eternal time static. Then a condensing into a pre-mass-motional-time intelligenced either through light (or separate knowledge) ‘waves’; then particalized ‘remembrances’ of an arc-energy origin into the motion mass-amalgam (...that may have a return ticket back through motion into light ...reversing knowledge, finally, back into the macro static).* Gyro relative forces extrapolations seem to be a lead into understandings for a universe ‘beingness origins’ force.

(PS - in this document we did not delve into orbitings of energy as imposed to differentiate mass formations into varying materials characteristics.)

*This is distribution/expansion and then returning/contracting back to the origin ... as opposed to going from all knowledge/motion time or continuing condensing/spending temporal energies until zero motion (all mass) time.

Back track of interconsecutive arcs back into spin... (but if spin is not gained) then possibly arcuate backtrack into time. The return of mass-motion into time by reversing the time (or mass-motion) precessional track by replacing the atomic torus particles exactly through where/how they came. Is this mechanically possible? Is it a time relative process, or is it only a current time mass-motion process?? Is there any such thing as current time+mass+motion in a historic continuum (the only real total energy datum)?

(time = mass & motion?)

...or other energy compendium of time = mass & motion (but when mass or motion goes to zero time doesn’t. It absorbs the deficit to change the torus of time or If both go to space relative zero the torus of time is then static.)

The torus particle radii change which is a replacement of the particle into a different orbit that carries establishment of a new centroid of the particle (all new) orbiting situation...creating a system because the particles are creating a sub orbiting system which moves the original system.

TIME + MASS + MOTION (? + A TIME* ENTROPY?)

PHOTON - Light energy (the next energy spectrum after the derivation of temporal time) input into the creation of the electron torus is the consecutive energy that moves the torus in its time mass motion energy transitions that comprise the existence continuum in a time mass motion oscillation (jump oscillation term to get back in time.) When precession goes to neutral period no particle radii differentiation occurs. It has reached a static response. The differential orbits don’t change, and no longer happen. A new focus must be adopted for the system. To precessionally energise movements in time+mass+motion a helix oscillation by shift in gyro neutral moment (period) may occur in natural time+mass+motion; and may be retractable by oscillation back tracking the precession of motion and or time and or mass.

* Another energy form in times content would be knowledge; and its metering into usefulness (evolution entropy). The time entropy would be knowledge conversions by both evolutions in nature and mans workings.